Osmoregulators in Hymenaea courbaril and Hymenaea stigonocarpa under water stress and rehydration

dc.contributor.authorAlves, Ediane Conceição
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Luma Castro de
dc.contributor.authorLuz, Luana Moraes da
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Jéssica Taynara da Silva
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Neto, Cândido Ferreira de
dc.contributor.authorPalheta, Juscelino Gonçalves
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Tamires Borges de
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Risely Ferraz de
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Raimundo Leonardo Lima de
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Roberto Cezar Lobo da
dc.contributor.authorVilhena, Nariane Quaresma
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-10T13:54:14Z
dc.date.available2018-10-10T13:54:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-20
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different water deficiency and rehydration levels on the concentrations of osmoregulators in two plant species (Hymenaea courbaril and H. Stigonocarpa) in the Amazon. We adopted a 2 × 5 × 5 factorial system, referring to 2 species (H. courbaril and H. stigonocarpa) and 5 stages of hydration and rehydration. The five hydration and rehydration stages were established in: (1) Control treatment E0; (2) Plants with 13 days of stress after incubation—E13; (3) Plants with 26 days of stress E26; (4) The plants that were established after 26 days after incubation and rehydrated for two days (RD2); (5) rehydrated for two days (RD4). The plants that were established after 26 days after incubation and rehydrated for four days. The experiment totaled fifty young plants with five replicates. Biochemical measurements were performed at the beginning of the experiment (E0) at 13 (E13) and 26 (E26) days after the water stress, in which the plants were rehydrated, repeating the analyses after two (RD2) and four (RD4) days. Both species increased the sucrose concentration by 18%, with a decrease of 52% in starch content. The RD4 time presented the highest mean starch concentration (0.19 mmol g−1 of the residue for H. courbaril and 0.27 mmol g−1 of residue for H. stigonocarpa). Increased proline concentrations were recorded for controls until RD2 for both species. For glycine betaine, the highest increases in treatments E26 and RD2 were observed for the H. courbaril species. Our rehydration period was not sufficient for total recovery of pre-stress concentrations of all studied solutes.en
dc.formatpdfpt-BR
dc.identifier.issn1993-0607
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0456-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/22220
dc.language.isoengpt-BR
dc.publisherJournal of Forestry Researchpt-BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 29, Issue 6, pp 1475–1479, November 2018pt-BR
dc.rightsSpringer Berlin Heidelbergpt-BR
dc.subjectAmazoniapt-BR
dc.subjectWater stresspt-BR
dc.subjectOsmotic adjustmentpt-BR
dc.subjectProline Sucrosept-BR
dc.titleOsmoregulators in Hymenaea courbaril and Hymenaea stigonocarpa under water stress and rehydrationen
dc.typeArtigopt-BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
artigo.pdf
Size:
592.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Texto completo

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: