Generalized linear mixed models for the genetic evaluation of binary reproductive traits: a simulation study

dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Diogo Anastácio
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Idalmo Garcia
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Fabyano Fonseca e
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães
dc.contributor.authorPires, Aldrin Vieira
dc.contributor.authorLeandro, Roseli Aparecida
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T10:43:50Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T10:43:50Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-06
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to evaluate the use of probit and logit link functions for the genetic evaluation of early pregnancy using simulated data. The following simulation/analysis structures were constructed: logit/logit, logit/probit, probit/logit, and probit/probit. The percentages of precocious females were 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% and were adjusted based on a change in the mean of the latent variable. The parametric heritability (h2) was 0.40. Simulation and genetic evaluation were implemented in the R software. Heritability estimates (ĥ2) were compared with h2 using the mean squared error. Pearson correlations between predicted and true breeding values and the percentage of coincidence between true and predicted ranking, considering the 10% of bulls with the highest breeding values (TOP10) were calculated. The mean ĥ2 values were under- and overestimated for all percentages of precocious females when logit/probit and probit/logit models used. In addition, the mean squared errors of these models were high when compared with those obtained with the probit/probit and logit/logit models. Considering ĥ2, probit/probit and logit/logit were also superior to logit/probit and probit/logit, providing values close to the parametric heritability. Logit/probit and probit/logit presented low Pearson correlations, whereas the correlations obtained with probit/probit and logit/logit ranged from moderate to high. With respect to the TOP10 bulls, logit/probit and probit/logit presented much lower percentages than probit/probit and logit/logit. The genetic parameter estimates and predictions of breeding values of the animals obtained with the logit/logit and probit/probit models were similar. In contrast, the results obtained with probit/logit and logit/probit were not satisfactory. There is need to compare the estimation and prediction ability of logit and probit link functions.en
dc.formatpdfpt-BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000100008
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/14742
dc.language.isoengpt-BR
dc.publisherRevista Brasileira de Zootecniapt-BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv. 41, n. 1, p. 52-57, Jan. 2012pt-BR
dc.rightsOpen Accesspt-BR
dc.subjectBeef cattlept-BR
dc.subjectEarly pregnancypt-BR
dc.subjectGenetic parameterspt-BR
dc.subjectGLMMpt-BR
dc.subjectLink functionpt-BR
dc.titleGeneralized linear mixed models for the genetic evaluation of binary reproductive traits: a simulation studyen
dc.typeArtigopt-BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
08.pdf
Size:
238.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
texto completo

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections