Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?

dc.contributor.authorCunha, Camila Soares
dc.contributor.authorMarcondes, Marcos Inácio
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Alex Lopes da
dc.contributor.authorGionbelli, Tathyane Ramalho Santos
dc.contributor.authorNovaes, Marco Aurélio Schiavo
dc.contributor.authorKnupp, Leonardo Sidney
dc.contributor.authorVirginio Júnior, Gercino Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorVeloso, Cristina Mattos
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T14:59:57Z
dc.date.available2023-10-20T14:59:57Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-15
dc.description.abstractThis research was conducted to investigate the effect of live and inactive sugarcane yeast on beef cattle voluntary intake, apparent digestibility of nutrients, ruminal pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA) concentrations, and ruminal ammonia. Five rumen-cannulated Nellore heifers were distributed in a 5×5 Latin square design, with five experimental periods of 15 days, with seven days for adaptation to the additives and the remaining days for data records and sampling. Total mixed ration (TMR) was composed by corn silage (20%) and concentrate (80%) based on corn and soybean meal. Five treatments were evaluated: without additive use (negative control; NC); chemical buffer addition – 0.71% in concentrate DM of sodium bicarbonate and 0.18% of magnesium oxide (positive control, PC); 10 g/day live yeast (LY); 15 g/day of inactive yeast (IY15); and 30 g/day of inactive yeast (IY30). Sugarcane yeasts were directly infused in rumen immediately after morning and afternoon feed supply. Feed additives did not affect voluntary intake, nutrient digestibility, and sorting behavior of animals. However, heifers from all treatments presented preferential intake of fibrous fraction of diet, especially those from NC and IY15. Nitrogen balance, VFA concentrations, and blood parameters were not influenced as well. Sodium bicarbonate and magnesium oxide led to greater ruminal pH than yeast, and IY15 presented greater pH than IY30. Ruminal ammonia was increased by the use of additives. Active and inactive yeasts are not recommended as feed additives for bovines fed diets with 80% of concentrate since it allows animals to select fibrous particles from TMR, and no representative gain in ruminal parameters and digestibilities are guaranteed.en
dc.formatpdfpt-BR
dc.identifier.citationCUNHA, C. S.; MARCONDES, M. I.; SILVA, A. L.; GIONBELLI, T. R. S.; NOVAES, M. A. S.; KNUPP, L. S.; VIRGINIO JÚNIOR, G. F.; VELOSO, C. M. Do live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment? Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 48, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/rbz4820180259pt-BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/rbz4820180259pt-BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180259
dc.identifier.urihttps://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/31667
dc.language.isoengpt-BR
dc.publisherBrazilian Journal of Animal Sciencept-BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv. 48, p. 01-10, 2019pt-BR
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Licensept-BR
dc.subjectDigestibilityen
dc.subjectFeed additiveen
dc.subjectIntakeen
dc.subjectPHen
dc.subjectRuminal ammoniaen
dc.subjectVolatile fatty acidsen
dc.titleDo live or inactive yeasts improve cattle ruminal environment?en
dc.typeArtigopt-BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1806-9290-rbz-48-e20180259.pdf
Size:
312.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
artigo

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections