Biomass components and water use efficiency in cactus pear under different irrigation systems and harvest frequencies

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Juliana Mara de Freitas
dc.contributor.authorAndrighetto, Cristiana
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Gustavo Pavan
dc.contributor.authorLupatini, Gelci Carlos
dc.contributor.authorDaldon, Murilo Scalet
dc.contributor.authorLima, Larissa Pereira de
dc.contributor.authorLuz, Patrícia Aparecida da
dc.contributor.authorBello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-20T18:22:39Z
dc.date.available2022-12-20T18:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-04
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation processen
dc.identifier.citationSantos, J. M. F.; Andrighetto, C.; Mateus, G. P.; Lupatini, G. C.; Daldon, M. S.; Lima, L. P.; Luz, P. A. and Bello, H. J. S. 2022. Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 51:e20210047.pt-BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047pt-BR
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290
dc.identifier.urihttps://locus.ufv.br//handle/123456789/30294
dc.language.isoengpt-BR
dc.publisherBrazilian Journal of Animal Sciencept-BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesR. Bras. Zootec., 51:e20210047, 2022pt-BR
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Licensept-BR
dc.subjectanimal welfareen
dc.subjectsilvopastoral systemen
dc.subjectthermal comforten
dc.titleBiomass components and water use efficiency in cactus pear under different irrigation systems and harvest frequenciesen
dc.typeArtigopt-BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1806-9290-rbz-51-e20210047.pdf
Size:
340.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
artigo

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections